--- https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm?rev=1612023582
+++ https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm?rev=1612023654
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
  ==== RPM database format change ====
  
  Quoting [[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb]]
  
- //The current rpm database implementation is based on Berkeley DB 5.x, a 
version which is unmaintained upstream for several years now. Berkeley DB 6.x 
is license incompatible so moving to that is not an option. In addition, the 
existing rpmdb implementation is notoriously unreliable as it's not 
transactional and has no other means to detect inconsistencies either.
+ > //The current rpm database implementation is based on Berkeley DB 5.x, a 
version which is unmaintained upstream for several years now. Berkeley DB 6.x 
is license incompatible so moving to that is not an option. In addition, the 
existing rpmdb implementation is notoriously unreliable as it's not 
transactional and has no other means to detect inconsistencies either.
  
  Changing to a more sustainable database implementation is long overdue. We 
propose to change the default rpmdb format to the new sqlite based 
implementation.//
  
    * The rpm database format changes from Berkeley DB to SQLite, conversion is 
automatic after rpm package set update. Backup of the old database is saved as 
''/var/lib/rpm.rpmbackup-VERSION-RELEASE'', using version and release of the 
package that is installed (not the old one). Ex. if the old package was 
rpm-5.4.15-58 and the new one is rpm-4.16.1.2-1, the backup of the database 
will be in ''/var/lib/rpm.rpmbackup-4.16.1.2-1''.


Diff URL:
  https://www.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm?do=diff&r1=1612023582&r2=1612023654

-- 
This mail was generated by DokuWiki at
https://www.pld-linux.org/
_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

Reply via email to