On 30.03.2021 14:26, atler wrote:
commit f329c346f35622a09475262bb712ae52aed03f4a
Author: Jan Palus <at...@pld-linux.org>
Date: Tue Mar 30 13:25:20 2021 +0200
use %cargo_* macros
rust.spec | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/rust.spec b/rust.spec
index 3e3e272..d792e2c 100644
--- a/rust.spec
+++ b/rust.spec
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Source1: %{name}-crates-%{version}.tar.xz
# Source1-md5: -
URL: -
BuildRequires: cargo
+BuildRequires: rpmbuild(macros) >= 2.003
BuildRequires: rust
BuildRequires: tar >= 1:1.22
BuildRequires: xz
@@ -40,19 +41,17 @@ EOF
%build
export CARGO_HOME="$(pwd)/.cargo"
-cargo -v build \
+%cargo_build \
%ifarch x32
--target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnux32 \
%endif
- --release \
--frozen
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
export CARGO_HOME="$(pwd)/.cargo"
-cargo -vv \
- install \
+%cargo_install \
--frozen \
--path . \
--root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}
why not include the crate based build options also into common macros?
also, in template-specs/rust.spec, there's comment for source0, creating
crate, maybe an universal script could be provided by macros package?
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en