On Monday 20 December 2004 11:28, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > looks like dead end, only way to solve it is dependancy of package > > containing static binary. > > This is the reason the "base" packages (like glibc, FHS, setup, etc.) do > not contain %pre/%post shell scripts. > The only acceptable script may be a LUA script. > Or just a static binary program call. hey
anything against if this goes to AC-branch? (this includes question about compiling with diet) http://glen.alkohol.ee/pld/glibc-ldpath-fix.patch and waiting for proposals for better script name for /sbin/glibc-postinst ps: what are the reasons postshell.c being in a patch and placed to elf/ directory? -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
