Dnia 15-06-2005, śro o godzinie 21:31 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a):
> is this really proper?
>
> # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> bind-9.2.5-2
> bind-9.2.5-2
> # l dev/
> total 0
> -rwxrwx--- 1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> -rwxrwx--- 1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> # pwd
> /var/lib/named
Are these filed or device nodes?
> spec reads:
> %attr(770,root,named) %{_var}/lib/named/dev/*
>
> and those 'files' are opened by named:
> 21:30:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] lib/named# rlsof -c named|grep `pwd`
> 5 named named 6w REG 3,6 1233 304107
> /var/lib/named/named.log
> 5 named named 10r REG 3,6 0 304102
> /var/lib/named/dev/random
> 5 named named cwd DIR 3,6 4096 304095 /var/lib/named
> 5 named named rtd DIR 3,6 4096 304095 /var/lib/named
Yes as named is chrooting itself to a strict jail in /var/lib/named.
--
Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
