Tomasz Pala wrote: > > EN! > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:38:38 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > A nie prosciej zrobic to na poziomie routingu? > > Tzn. nie NAT-owac polaczen z/do okreslonych IP. > > It's easier, but you waste adresses for gateway, network and broadcast.
No, I don't. Hint: use routing to a single host, not full network. > It's not problem when you're LIR, but most people in Poland have no more > than /27. Soon I'll face dividing /20 for customers and I'm thinking > about using /32 masks - anyone has some experience? Just an example of routing table: X.Y.Z.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src X.Y.Z.1 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 X.Y.Z.10 dev eth1 scope link default via X.Y.Z.254 dev eth0 onlink And either: - configure routing to X.Y.Z.10 via X.Y.Z.1 on any host in X.Y.Z.0/24 on eth0 that needs the routing (especially the gw, X.Y.Z.254), or - configure proxy arp on X.Y.Z.1 machine (to respond on arp requests for X.Y.Z.10 on eth0) -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
