Elan =?iso-8859-13?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 23:27, Adam Gorzkiewicz wrote:
> > > SOURCES/kdebase-startkde.patch:1.9 ---
> > > SOURCES/kdebase-startkde.patch:1.8 Sun Nov 13 21:01:35 2005 ++
> > > + SOURCES/kdebase-startkde.patch Sun Nov 13 21:03:37 2005 @@
> > > -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > > # run KPersonalizer before the session, if this is the first login
> > > if test "$kpersonalizerrc_general_firstlogin" = "true"; then
> > > -+ if test `/usr/bin/which kpersonalizer 2>/dev/null`; then
> > > ++ if [ -x /usr/bin/kpersonalizer ]; then
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > I think i'ts wrong to hardcode the accurate path here. In this case You
> > can't eg. to redefine "%{_prefix}" at build time.
> i was more thinking that using `which` it could find outdated kpersonalizer
> which you had manually installed to /usr/local, and it really should use
> kpersonalizer from rpm installation.
>
> i guess need to vote here, which way to go ;)
Ask the rpm database? Just another proposal...
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
