On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:47, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > so, my problem was that i had installed both athlon and amd64 packages on > > system (due wanting to run 32-bit openoffice, which needs python-libs) [..] > Yes, it's known problem and already discussed[1], but no solution has been > implemented so far. > > [1] in Polish language, but example patches should be readable in any > language > > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2004-December/121358.html > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2004-December/12161.html mandriva had some version of those patches, perhaps newer, so i took from there.
> > if taking look on other distros, then the just put all their files to > > /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 > > - http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/python/ > > - http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/python/FC-4/ > > Some time ago we moved arch-independent stuff (and, unfortunately, > distutils) to /usr/share to allow creating packages with python bytecode > as noarch. i've commited the changes, and tested so that i had amd64 and athlon -lib packages installed. when ran from amd64 python binary libdirs with lib64 were searched when ran from athlon python binary, libdirs with lib were searched. could you test and does it cover also distutils problems? -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
