On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote: > hello, > > th is quite usable for some of us now, so what about > such two rules? > > 1. if you send something to th builders, then it should > build on all archs. this means that if package building > fails on one of the builders, then it is sender responsibility > to fix this before sending another request. > > if you are not able to fix something, then tell about it on the list, > so we can work together to fix the problem.
and the winner is... 4458. 2006.04.16 23:03:17 from cieciwa (...) test-build qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD ) [th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK] 4460. 2006.04.16 23:15:39 from cieciwa (...) upgrade qcad-2.0.4.0-2.src.rpm (qcad.spec -R HEAD ) [th-x86_64:FAIL th-athlon:OK th-i486:OK th-i686:OK th-ppc:OK] _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
