On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: > > > > BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. > > > > > > Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? > > > > mozilla.spec > > mozilla-firefox.spec > > mozilla-thunderbird.spec > > > so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho > > I think we should rename mozilla-firefox to firefox and the same for > thunderbird.
Sources are called just firefox and thunderbird, but full application names are "Mozilla Firefox" and "Mozilla Thunderbird". And the latter is a companion to the first, so it's rational to keep them grouped. > We don't call libnotify galago-project-libnotify nor do we > name other packages in a similar way. So seamonkey and xulrunner should > be named by their project names, not their vendors (especially when > seamonkey is not officially supported). And the last remark was the reason I committed seamonkey.spec, not mozilla-seamonkey.spec. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
