Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21-05-2006 13:04]: > On Sun, 21 May 2006, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:48:27PM +0200, radek wrote: >>> Author: radek Date: Sun May 21 10:48:27 2006 GMT >>> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD >>> ---- Log message: >>> - version 1.2.13 >>> - commented out BR/R: javamail, jms, jmx: builds without these >>> (I'm not sure if it's a proper change, though) >> I think it is not -- that will probably result in very limited log4j >> package. That should be built with all the requirements and CLASSPATH >> prepared adequately. The best is to look into jpackage how they did >> that.
In progress. > Exactly, without those R we will get incomplete package. I didn't know about java-gnu-mail... so, javamail is not an issue. Will it be incomplete as "useless" or as "with limited functionality"? >> javamail is provided via our gnu-java-mail. I am not sure what provides >> jms and jmx (it may be sun-java or something elese). > jms.spec:http://java.sun.com/products/jms/docs.html > jmx.spec:http://java.sun.com/products/JavaManagement/ These two are not distributable, so if we restore BR, we won't be able to distribute log4j... -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpljxQX2teqK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
