On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:24:50PM +0200, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:54:33AM +0100, wrobell wrote: > > > weirdy difference between sh from ksh and bash: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ bash > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [ "3000000000" -ge "2000000000" ] && echo works > > > works > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sh > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [ "3000000000" -ge "2000000000" ] && echo works > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /bin/sh /bin/bash > > > > > > pdksh-5.2.14-43 > > > bash-3.1.017-1 > > > > 32 bit unsigned int vs 32 bit signed int vs 64 bit long? > ano. > but - it works differrent on miscelious archs (on 64bits - works ok). > > what is correct? bash or ksh behaviour?
I think bash is correct. But ksh may be correct too - see below. > i think ksh behaviour is a bug... Does POSIX/SUS specify what integer values should be supported? I can't find it now. I assume that values larger than some value are allowed to give "undefined" results. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
