Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-08-2006 11:46]:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:20:42AM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>> Szymon Siwek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-08-2006 06:30]:
>> [...]
>>> - CF="%{rpmcflags} -I. -Wall -DASM_CRC" \
>>> + CF="%{rpmcflags} -I. -Wall -DASM_CRC -DLARGEFILE_SOURCE
>>> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" \
>> What would be the correct way to do this globally in Th?
>> Changing %optflags, or rather some gcc header file?
>> Should we do it?
> No.
> This is per-app thing.
> LFS-ready apps already define proper flags (usually through autoconf
> macro).Well, unzip doesn't (assuming the patch is correct). As I understand [1] and [2], it's also a problem of mixing applications / libraries compiled in 32 and 64 mode. > Others should be reviewed individually. Defining anything won't convert > ints to 64-bit in bad-written code. But would it hurt to have 64 bit off_t by default? [1] http://ac-archive.sourceforge.net/largefile/summary.html 404, copy: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://ac-archive.sourceforge.net/largefile/summary.html [2] http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/709/ -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpJndc93f8k8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
