Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22-09-2006 15:11]: > On Friday 22 September 2006 13:11, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: >> Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22-09-2006 11:36]: >>> On Friday 22 September 2006 12:31, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: >>>> Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22-09-2006 00:22]: >>>>> xmltv from HEAD doesn't build again, could you help me out? >>>> Sure, done. Tested in Th environment. Some %files are missing. >>> still fails on AC, some bad BR? >> No, lack of policy for handling cases, when perl is distributed with >> a module in version newer or equal than one we have distributed >> separately. > what about policy that we don't bundle the packages in perl-modules?
IIRC, we kept (some of) them separate in perl 5.6. While preparing 5.8.0, my goals included: * allow coexistence of different perl versions (I was hoping, that some day RPM will start to handle multiple packages with the same name nicely -- silly me) * "poldek -i perl" installs whatever modules come with the perl tarball. Right now, both are fulfilled. I'm not too convinced if the first one is actually useful, though. Installing separate perl in /usr/local is way easier, than dealing with RPM. > additional pros on that is that the base perl install gets smaller. What would you like to strip? PS I consider it to be rude: publishing e-mail without asking first. -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp7wc0YcypMV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
