On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:01, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > ping > > Would sb bacport a fix or are we switching Ac to use autoconf 2.60 and > making libtasn1 soname change? i'd go for ac, am upgrade.
if all apps compile with new libtasn1 - no blocker for soname change. hawk? > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, qboosh wrote: > > > Author: qboosh Date: Mon Sep 25 19:08:38 2006 GMT > > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > > > ---- Log message: > > > - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790) > > > > Should we upgrade gnutls in Ac[1] or backport fix[2]? > > > > [1] it would require autoconf 2.60 (because of new gnulib) and libtasn1 > > soname change > > > > [2] from here: > > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001212.html > > or from another distro -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
