Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 11:54 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a): > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > But it tests only IFS compliance. > > What about all other functionality? > Haven't seen tests for other functionality.
Should we aim at perfect POSIX compatibility or perfect usability? Bash does not seem to be a heavy dependency and is actively maintained (so the compatibility issues will go away over time as opposed to pdksh). > > bash is not 100% POSIX compliant, although (at least) some of issues are > > commonly accepted (e.g. no escape expansion in echo without -e switch). > It seems that there is no single POSIX compilant shell. I wonder which is > closest to posix compilance? As above. -- Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux
signature.asc
Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
