On Nov 26, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 21:50 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>>> On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>>> >>>> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/file- >>>> offset.patch?rev=1.1 >>> >>> More hacky but better :) >>> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/file-offset.patch? >>> rev=1.2 >> >> Of course there are still problems. >> >> libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.la >> >> Now other packages get R: libtool(libdb.la) but nothing provides >> it since it's >> not detected. >> >> Wouldn't be it better to generate Requires: /usr/lib/file.la >> instead of >> libtool(/usr/lib/file.la) ? That way we wouldn't need to rebuild >> all packages >> containing .la files. > > Or simply: > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100 > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100 > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > do > case "$dep" in > /*.la) > + $dep = `readlink -f $dep` > echo "libtool($dep)" > ;; > esac >
Nice. FWIW, libdb.la within rpm is a sick Makefile hack. Patches cheerfully accepted. 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
