On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > I see that *gphoto2 2.3.0 have been built for Ac, but they have been > misbuilt with(out) old libexif (i.e. libgphoto2 requires libexif 0.6.13, > but Ac has 0.6.12, so libgphoto2 built without libexif support, but > still requiring libexif 0.6.13 in .pc file - and that's the source of > libgphoto2 version detection problems in gphoto2 or other packages). > > Conclusion: if libgphoto2 2.3.0 stays in Ac, libexif must be updated to > 0.6.13 and libgphoto2 rebuilt afterwards. > > There was no soname change in libexif, but some apps require _build_ > time fixes (now headers must be included as <libexif/*.h> instead of > just <*.h>); rebuilding is not needed.
sent -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
