=?iso-8859-2?q?Rafa=B3_Cygnarowski?= wrote: > > Dnia wtorek, 23 stycznia 2007, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał: > > Yes. > > I even know a person who is using one of them. > > They are dumb and very useful for copying CDs protected by malformed CD > > info. > > How do you think: persons with such hardwer need special kernel with extra > patches? What about vanila-up kernels for those machines?
It does not matter what I think about this specific case. We are talking about our policy rules. Personally, I have no objections against using SMP kernel as a 686 default. Unless there is something non-SMP for special cases. But is there any advantage if still two kernels are maintained ? -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
