On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:45:54PM +0200, Cezary Krzyzanowski wrote:
> Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 17:55 +0100, wrobell napisał(a):
>
> > imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create
> > vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages.
>
> 1. What is fat? perl is fat for me, python not and it was on by default
> 2. Vim static is the choice for slim solutions.
Just for the record:
$ rpm -q --qf '%-12{NAME}: %{SIZE}\n' perl-base python-libs ruby tcl vim-rt
perl-base : 2936355
python-libs : 1828755
ruby : 1094668
tcl : 4306684
vim-rt : 14952921
(assuming that libs packages suffice to run vim without complaints)
But the original question was: do particular language support overhead is
worth its benefits?
Are there already some packaged or custom vim addons which need all these
languages?
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
