Tomasz Pala wrote: > > Numeric mm is NOT month name _abbreviayion_. > > Yep. Roman numeric neither. These abbreviations don't exist thus we use > numbers. Arabic numbers.
It is used instead of non-existent abreviation. What do you suggest to use if you want to write "17 lutego" shortly? "17.02" (eg.: <start of a sentence> 17.02 <end of the sentence>) IMO 17.II is less misleading. But if you do not agree, talk to glibc-locale people (and do not forget to document your arguments with examples of current use). > > IMO I/II/III is better than sty/lut/mar. > > Roman numbers ARE NOT abbreviations. They are obsoleted form of writing > dates in numeric. Yeah. Don't forget to document that this form is no longer in use :) -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 19 36 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
