On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:31:48PM +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > > > > > any comments? > > > > The basic packages should be 'low reqs' and 'high reqs' (which > > > > translates to -- no langs and all langs). Anything in between should be > > > > left to ppl directly interested. > > > > > > "All-or-nothing" isn't the best choice... > > > I think that there should be 3 possibilities: > > > - vim like in current packages we know. It would be nice to keep it. > > > - vim-tiny (or minimal) - for monks > > > - vim-full - for those who like all the bells and whistles > > What's the difference between current vim and vim-full? > > AFAIR current vim has only perl enabled by default. > Or only perl was enabled some time ago...
So maybe let's enable perl and python, keeping tcl and ruby disabled until someone proves that (s)he really needs them. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
