> I dont understand why making 3 lines of distro (with all the time and > work effort) which almost are identical (or becomes to be)
Just a few thoughts that I wanted to share... I gave up Ac as some updates/changes were impossible to do or shoudn't take place in stable distro (glibc, gcc, kernel, modular xorg). There is no way that Ac will be even close to Th without very drastic changes. When no one except RM will use Ac then it will probably die after some time (like Ra did). Its sad that so many problems exist in current stable line (judging from mail lists and opinions that I've received on priv). Personally I was only affected by rpm 4.4.9 problems, but "hold = rpm*" have fixed them :) Probably all of these issues could be resolved before broken packages were moved to updates if enough people would use ready tree and report bugs. Remember: if no one is testing pakcages and they work ok for RM then they will be moved to updates. Belive me, I know :) I've started Titanium because (as mentioned above) there was no way to force some updates/changes in Ac that I needed. My own fork assures that I may change whatever I need and there is no way that someone will force me to change that back. Titanium will be very similar to Th as I'm using HEAD versions of packages (there are just few exceptions). Basically it is and will be "what Hawk needs" as long as I own this fork. I'm just sharing work that I'd have to do anyway. I'm also glad that some people found Titanium usable, switched to it and are now helping me by sending problem reports, ideas etc. Thanks for reading :) M. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
