On Thursday 31 July 2008 18:57, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:01:45PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On Thursday 31 July 2008 13:03:33 glen wrote: > > > +# TODO > > > +# - make it generic for gecko based browsers (browser-plugins should > > > first support this) > > > +# call it one of: (RFC welcome) > > > +# - browser-extension-gecko-firephp > > > +# - gecko-addon-firephp > > > +# - gecko-extension-firephp > > > +# - mozilla-extension-firephp > > > +# - mozilla-addon-firephp > > > +Summary: Firefox Extension for FirePHP > > > +Name: firephp > > > > i'd like to hear your opinion on the package namespace, so further > > packages could follow it. > > Not mozilla-* (it's restricted name). ok with that.
> gecko-* or browser-gecko-*. > Or maybe browser-xul-extension-* (I'm not sure if these extensions are > more related to gecko or xul?) i'd like to see "extension" or "addon" in package name. however xul vs gecko i can't answer ... -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
