On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 19:23:40 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > No, you don't get it.
I do get it... > foo1 is code from project X version Y. [...] > Now the project X releases version Z, including foo2 (with the same [...] > PLD applies the former patch and gets no error. Or even decides to [...] ...and I don't argue with that from the very beginning. But it's the patch what is broken during dumb update (which can happen even without -l) thus I've suggested adding '-F 0' which enforces more checking, so that probability of passing old patches is reduced. The Question was: is there any case where _proper_ patch can do any damage applied this way? -- Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
