On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Zsolt Udvari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > I want to create texlive.spec, and it's under developing. I use the > tetex.spec as the beginning, but I've a question: should I split more > subpackages the texlive package? What I think: the style-files, > documentclass-files, e.g. exam.cls put into texlive-latex-exam, etc. > When you think it, I make it. Imho it would be better (nearer to > "pld-philosphy": http://www.pld-linux.org/Features -> Micropackages).
Since tetex is unmaintained we will certainly need TeXLive at one point or another. I suggest you make the package split however you feel is appropriate, add necessary obsoletes and just commit it. Others will have their chance to improve upon your work if they feel that's necessary before migrating PLD to the new TeX. Currently the tetex-* package tree in PLD is huge and there is no point in splitting "just because we can". I'm sure nobody will shoot you for doing your part even if others don't agree with the subpackages you propose :) -- Patryk Zawadzki _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
