On Wednesday 15 July 2009 13:04, Bartosz Świątek wrote: > W dniu 15 lipca 2009 11:57 użytkownik Elan Ruusamäe > > <[email protected]> napisał: > > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 09:59, Bartosz Świątek wrote: > >> 2009/7/15 Elan Ruusamäe <[email protected]>: > >> > On Sunday 12 July 2009 21:13, shadzik wrote: > >> >> +%if "%{pld_release}" == "ti" > >> >> +Requires: kde4-kde3support-devel > >> >> +%else > >> >> Requires: kdelibs-devel > >> >> +%endif > >> > > >> > like th has "kdelibs" package available in main (th-obsolete doesn't > >> > count)? if you want to support ac on head use != "ac" > >> > >> AFAIK noone in Th is interested in having k3b 1, they already use k3b > >> 2. Hawk asked me to force k3b 1 to build with kde4-kde3support on Ti > >> and so I did. This change doesn't break anything on Ac, does it? If > >> you like, feel free to change the 'if' statements I've added, but IMHO > >> it's useless cosmetics. > > > > what i'm saying the bcond is pointless. th has also no kdelibs-devel, but > > kde4-kde3support-devel. > > You're probably right. I just didn't want to break anything on HEAD. > On the other hand, Th RM might want to rebuild kde3 with the new > libjpeg7 in which case k3b would also be rebuilt with kdelibs and not > kde4-kde3support, so maybe it's wise to wait until that is finished or > at least until the decision if kde3 is going to be rebuild is made.
th has no kde3, which still means NO "kdelibs" packages. and stop removing cc: addresses when replying. -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
