On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Marcin Krol <h...@limanowa.net> wrote: >>> I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping >>> separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I wasn't merging >>> my changes/updates to HEAD. >> >> But that's not our fault, is it? :) > > Yes it is. Hawk working on Titanium and not merging his changes because > of -ENOTIME - bad, some developers are unhappy that they must merge to > HEAD themselves. So Hawk starts working on HEAD separating Titanium > specific changes - also bad, some developers are unhappy that Titanium > stuff is on HEAD despite its separated and doesn't affect Th at all.
Well, until I had to clean up mess in some of the spec files and non-building packages. Not speaking about some stupid commit war around ac/ti/th/whatever changes, which would not happen if appropriate changes were kept on a branch. [...] >> My point is - in the past it was decided that distro branches are kept >> on separate >> branches and it worked in case of Ra, Ac and Th (aka nest) > > I'll be honest. Moving all specs to Titanium branch will mean death of > my fork. I simply have no time to track each and every spec for changes > to be merged or branch point to be moved. I don't have as much time as I > had in the past to maintaint PLD. Thats my problem, I agree. Probably I missed some discussion on irc or pld-devel-pl... but what is exact purpose of Titanium? Why it started in first place? w _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en