=?UTF-8?B?UmFkb3PFgmF3IFppZWxpxYRza2k=?= wrote: > > 2010/6/8 <[email protected]>: > > RPM's Release is and have to be our internal number, not the upstream one. > > Any "release" that is external to us have to go to the "Version" field in > > some way. > > Well, that's not how we've been doing things so far. betaX, alphaX, > rcX, snapshots, whatever -- it all usually goes to Release.
Yes, but it is for 0.X.Y Release format. And Y is the part still under our controll. > And I don't see a way of doing this without frequent Epoch bumps. What would be nice to avoid. Especially as rpm does not like multiple packages with same Version-Release. Even if Epoch is bumped. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [email protected] _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
