On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:02, Marcin Rybak <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no idea if it's important to PLD, but if we take sources from oficial > ftp.proftpd.org this should be taken into account: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org
PLD's spec file was last updated on the 25th before the above mentioned compromise took place and the md5 checksum we have for our sources is the correct validated one. Thanks for the heads up. Caleb _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
