[FUT: pld-discuss]
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:15:48PM +0100, shadzik wrote:
> ================================================================
> Index: packages/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.spec
> diff -u packages/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.spec:1.59
> packages/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.spec:1.60
> --- packages/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.spec:1.59 Thu Jan 27 12:10:40 2011
> +++ packages/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.spec Thu Jan 27 12:15:43 2011
> @@ -15,6 +15,17 @@
> Name: open-vm-tools
> Version: %{snap}.%{rev}
> #Version: %{ver}.%{rev}
> +
> +exit 1
> +
> +TODO
> +- przywrocic epoch
> +- naprawic Version
> +- ten syf na pewno nie zbuduje sie na 2.6.16, wiec podbic BR
> +
> +na koniec pragne dodac ze gloczke to fajfus
> +
> +
There are defined standard rules of:
- communication between developers
- spec syntax
- noting TODO entries
- inserting build blockers
- language to use in spec files
Either obey the rules or go away.
Also, the usual way of getting spec to usable state after getting broken by
sb not willing to fix is to revert whole his changes. It works better.
(or fix by yourself)
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
