>> >> - ta_LK (Sri Lanka Tamil) unsupported, rel 2 >> >> >> > caleb, why only this one? :) >> >> Valid question. The workings of find_lang and some other rpm ninja >> tricks are still slightly magic to me. >> >> In this case, because it worked. That one language was causing RPM to >> fail to install, and removing it allowed it to be installed without >> errors. >> > > ok, my first through was that we drop languages that it's impossible that > PLD user will ever use, and second... "why only this one" :)
There are an awful lot that could not realistically be used. Has the possibility of a whitelist of fully included languages been considered? It seems like every spec has a different list of problematic languages that have to be cleaned up, but across the distro there isn't a lot of consistency here. > on what environment it fails to build? I had no problems with transmission. It didn't fail to build, the resulting rpm fails to install with a dependency error on a tl_LK language directory. (TH 64) Caleb _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
