On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Kacper Kornet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> That can be because 'git rev-list', used to generate the changelog, > > >> returns the commits ordered by commit date and not the AuthorDate > > Doing qsort(3) on RPMTAG_CHANGELOG* in rpmbuild isn't too hard, might be > > easier than trying to figure out how to trick up git sewage. > I wonder if RPM really needs to enforce the changelog order. Would it > really hurt if it just allowed building a package with such seemingly > unordered entries? Will anything break if we just disable the test? So we have two solutions: a) Switch to show committer dates in changelog. It should be possible to show these dates should be in chronological order. Drawback: for commits migrated from CVS this date is set to some value =~ time of cvs->git migration b) Patch rpm in PLD to remove enforcing of chronological order in changelog. The patch seems trivial. I would go for b). -- Kacper _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
