On Wednesday 22 of August 2012, Lukasz Kies wrote: > 2012/8/22 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <[email protected]>: > > On Wednesday 22 of August 2012, kiesiu wrote: > >> The branch 'dev-3.5.x' was created. > > > > Why not on DEVEL branch as we are used to do? > > Hi, > > Just to add which development version is used in particular branch - > which could helps in case we want to keep those branches.
I guess in this case we will not want to keep 3.5.x branch because 3.6 will be stable and that's what we will use. > Of course if we are going to remove them just after merging they could > be DEVEL as it was in the past. dev-3.5.x will be dead as soon as 3.6 is released as stable. > If such approach is confusing I'll use only DEVEL for branches in the > future, leaving those already created as they are. DEVEL for things like this IMO - that are needed for some time and then not needed anymore. dev-3.5.x would be fine, too if it get deleted when 3.6 stable kicks in but I guess no one will remember to delete it. named/versioned branches are fine for things that we do want to keep and update like POSTGRESQL_8_3 and similar -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
