Hello, >> 3. "when the disk isn't/wasn't working properly, every solution is utterly >> useless"
> You are clueless: saving state remotely permits an > entire machine to be recreated when hard drives fail. > Backups and off-site storage are well known remedies > for hard drive failures. You are writing about some strange (complicated and not easy to implement) solutions. I like the rollback behavior in old rpm, it was working in the way I expect. Now You, as author of rpm, are writing, that I'm only person in the world, which is using this option... If so, don't bother anymore, but leaving this option in --help is missleading for me, but as You stated earlier - only for me. Do You (other PLD users/devs) use repackege only with --oldpackage ? Noone is/were using --rollback ? Or - You don't use repackage :P ? You never regret installing new versions of some rpms :) ? >> 4. I've written this for this conversation as simplest demonstration of what >> is missing. >> > Yes: you are a simpleton. Jeff, I think You are going to far. Peace, men. -- Pozdrawiam, Łukasz Chrustek _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
