On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 11:58:57 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson <n3...@me.com> wrote:
> Maybe. I can say that the existing rpm implementation has been used
> by many for years without any change whatsoever.
>
> FIx your LOOP before guessing at what is broken.
But THERE IS NO LOOP. RPM shows loop due to some imaginary dependency.
Package A requires package B which requires /some/dir from package FHS.
But my RPM shows: package A requires package B which requires /some/dir
from package C which requires package D which requires /some/other/dir
from package E which requires package A. And package C does not contain
/some/dir, nor package E contains /some/other/dir. RPM sees dependencies
which are not there, so it reports loop. Details in my previous mail
Greets,
Jacek
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
