On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:22:45PM +0000, Witold Filipczyk wrote: > Jakub Bogusz <qboosh <at> pld-linux.org> writes: > > > > > How to split it? > > One big package is too big e.g. for non-GUI apps. > > > > RH/Fedora uses base and -gui. > > Rosa (Mandriva?) uses libqt5core etc. > > > > In qt4 we used QtModule convention - should we follow it, using Qt5Module > > packages? > > > > Alternatives are: > > libQt5Module > > qt5-Qt5Module > > qt5-libQt5Module > > > > I think that Qt5Module convention is the most simple and consistent with > > our qt4 packages. > > The question is: > to split or not to split? > 35MB is big or not?
After separation of qmake (4 MB) and other devel tools (5 MB) it's (for x86): 21MB for base runtime 19MB for devel Qt5Core is ~4MB, Qt5Network ~1MB, Qt5DBus ~0.5MB, Qt5Sql 0.2MB (+modules, not required for development), Qt5Test 0.1MB, Qt5Xml 0.2MB - total ~30% of base package. The rest is GUI (having also more dependencies), so I'd split. > If split, then every single library in separate package. > It will be easier to package this way. But what with plugins? > > If split, then split other qt5-libraries. > IMO: Naming convention: specs like in Fedora qt5-qtbase.spec, qt5- > qtxmlpatterns.spec, etc. > Package names like: Qt5Xml , Qt5Xml-devel, qt5-qtbase-doc, qt5-qtbase- > examples. Libraries like in qt4, docs and examples take names from specs. Agreed. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
