On Sunday 13 of July 2014, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:28:47PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 12 of July 2014, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > > > Hi. There are outdated manual pages in glibc.spec: > > > > Source5: http://qboosh.pl/man/%{name}-man-pages.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > > So the question is - do we really want them there? man-pages project > > > > have updated version, so why we don't use these pages from > > > > man-pages? > > > > > > This tarball should be updated from latest man pages. > > > > > > I worked on some automation scripts for updating per-package man pages > > > tarballs a few years ago, maybe it would be easy to use them for glibc > > > now... > > > > I fail to understand why we want them in glibc.spec so badly. > > man-pages.spec providing them is more sane to me. > > To get ldconfig manuals together with ldconfig, similarly for ldd, > getconf etc. - just like in other packages.
This approach clearly doesn't work for section 3 man pages. So maybe keep man3 in man-pages and keep that (mostly outdated) glibc-man-pages tarball for tools? -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en