On 25.08.2016 21:24, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 25 of August 2016, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>what's our idea of openssl version in th?
>
># 1.0.2 is LTS release
># Version 1.0.2 will be supported until 2019-12-31.
>#https://www.openssl.org/about/releasestrat.html
>
>do we stay with 1.0.2 or proceed with any version like 1.1.0?
1.1.0 is AFAIK heavily incompatibile, so it's better to wait until others do
porting job:-)
Can it be installed in parallel with 1.0?
Are symbols versioned so binary using other libraries linked to 1.0 and 1.1
will work and symbols won't clash?
new soname, so yes
but our current packaging uses unversioned paths, so no without
packaging changes
-devel still has libssl.so, and i haven't seen any package using any
other library name than that. luckily there are pkgconfig files, but it
would still need patch every program that uses openssl to force
versioned pkg-config files
there's dev-1.1 branch on openssl package in pld repo updating to 1.1 branch
--
glen
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
