On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:50:45 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: >> D: PUB: AF3F93BC E4F1BC2D V4 DSA >> D: SIG: AF3F93BC E4F1BC2D V4 DSA-SHA1 POSITIVE >> D: PUB: 732FDFDE EAE6F8B8 V4 RSA >> D: SIG: 732FDFDE EAE6F8B8 V4 RSA-SHA1 POSITIVE >> D: UID: RSApub (PLD Linux Distribution 3.0 (Th)) <[email protected]> >> D: ========== DSA pubkey id af3f93bc e4f1bc2d (h#968[0]) >> error: keepassx-2.0.2-2.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 DSA signature: BAD, key ID >> e4f1bc2d >> >> Am I simply wrong, or is it the same DSA key signature with different >> results? > > http://ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=hget&search=5B9E545012899D925DE92F364995E354 [...] > from this place rpm -qi gpg-pubkey follows (additional lines): > > hUsAoJ44g5TWhmvGqXUiDOIAjfw6QXSvAKCLWEANVGfXOihK7zxAMvXqZj2wepiNBEezUgYB > BADTsxN1pG5XtEcXwLayVtr1frEKNIE5ckWmKxx8040/ql+p9tzWtteRL5uAh5VbtfdQnFt4 > gFoZJPsm1zMFsx9+LhV5nm5ZIowztde3vxyxCRuO90+PJy+N2DFHmIQMeuDzATN6O8VKUO2K > 1yzAaMmZdPC56cEidSjg9M95v/814wARAQABtEFSU0FwdWIgKFBMRCBMaW51eCBEaXN0cmli > dXRpb24gMy4wIChUaCkpIDx0aC1hZG1pbkBwbGQtbGludXgub3JnPoi2BBMBAgAgBQJHs1IG > AhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQcy/f3urm+Lg8dwP7BdZCN5OTnwbwskRo > Ae4Hxs9t9hxW05maLJD5zyQTm+eL2o2uvIkzq67soB2aUVNPm0RCqnzh99BaqQSAGj4bpBcj > eFup2mhGy706QS6eaVl9cNigsfi3ehvAE5Qd5N5V12olY4Sik7q/F9MH+F/GAiPRdCpzLM2x
Apparently rpm concatenated DSA with RSA and uses it as a single key: ~: rpm -qi gpg-pubkey Summary : gpg(RSApub (PLD Linux Distribution 3.0 (Th)) <[email protected]>) while this is DSA+RSA. -- Tomasz Pala <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
