On Tuesday 25 of October 2016, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:02, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 of October 2016, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > >> For our usage padding seems to be a smart solution (indeed breaking > >> vanilla kernels though). > > > > And breaking all our existing non vserver kernels, too obviously. > > how that "breakage" represents itself? iptables -I failure? kernel > memory trashing? kernel crash?
iptables command exits with failure when trying to add the rule > and probably only you use that combination anyway > (vserver+iptables+owner) otherwise there'd be more talk about that > incompat in pld lists. Then for these people it doesn't matter which iptables varient they use. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
