> On Feb 5, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Tomasz Pala <go...@polanet.pl> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:47:32 +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: >> >> Using lib/lib64/libx32 instead of libexec was much smarter in this case. > > No, it only hidden the problem behind getconf binary being handled > _somehow_. I once even wondered how this is done, apparently rpm is > trying to be way too smart. >
RPM implements arch specific content generally as: Libraries on different paths. Executables on same path. This requires a resolution to a preferred arch (usually x86_64) when installing executables onto identical paths. Whether RPM is too smart or the requested implementation is insufficiently general is arguable. For example, one might desire the ability for per-file-path configurable choice of architecture rather than per-system confIguration. 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
