On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:16 AM Jan Rękorajski via pld-devel-en > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have prepared rpm 4.16, poldek and support packages, they are > > > available on http://ftp1.pld-linux.org/people/baggins/rpm.org/ > > > > > > I would appreciate if you could test the uprade path, functionality > > > and tell me if anything is missing / broken. > > > > > > > Is there a set of git repos with the packaging and patches somewhere? > > Eveything is in PLD git repo, rpm and rpm-pld-macros on branch rpm.org > > http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi/packages/rpm.git/ > http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi/packages/rpm-pld-macros.git/ > > Everythong else on master (you need with rpm4 for poldek) > > http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi/packages/poldek.git/ > > > Also, as an FYI: rpm-specdump can be retired for rpm's built-in rpmspec(8) > > tool. > > Thanks, but I'll stick with rpm-specdump and rpm-getdeps for now, switching to > rpmspec may require rewriting build tools. I don't want tp make too > many, possible breaking, changes at once. >
That's fair, but I would suggest making a bug or something for everything using those to switch over. > There is also added bonus of forced PY2 -> PY3 transition for other > tools. rpm5 can't do PY3, rpm.org can't do PY2 :/ > What stuff still uses RPM Python bindings that are Python 2 only in PLD? Most of the RPM ecosystem tools I know of have Python 3 ports now... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
