On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:27:37PM -0700, Aredridel wrote: > I've been packing up a number of Ruby packages of late, and I had a > style question: > > If I have a ruby package, "active_record", version 0.5, that provides > the classes/module "ActiveRecord", what's a good package name for it? > > * active_record > * ruby-active_record > * ruby-ActiveRecord > > I'm leaning toward the last, to be consistent with Perl. Comments? >
Sounds reasonable (not that I know anything about Ruby packages). -- -- .- Bartek Jakubski ------- JabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -. -- -- | Free Software is a matter of liberty, not price | -- -- `-----------------(http://www.fsf.org/philosophy)------' -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
