Dnia 19-09-2004, nie o godzinie 14:28 +0200, havner napisał(a): > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Grzegorz Goławski wrote: > > Dnia 19-09-2004, nie o godzinie 12:14 +0200, Artur Frysiak napisał(a): > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 01:10:01AM +0200, Grzegorz Goławski wrote: > > > > Is there any reason, why rpm checks only for regular files when checking > > > > for upackaged files? > > > > IMHO it would be better if rpm shows also unpackaged directories and > > > > symlinks. > > > > > > ... and allways report "/" as unpackaged dir ? > > Ok, so it won't work with directories, but change for detect unpackaged > > symlinks is quite simple. I will change it in cvs. > > What about AC-branch? There is a problem. With this patch rpm shows all symlinks as unpackaged, even if they are packaged. To avoid this, rpm sources should be patched, but I don't know how. So, for now, I revert this change.
-- Grzegorz Goławski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
