Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
> Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20-09-2004 11:21]:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:06:14 +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
> >> PS  gotar, ankry, others: do we have a CDG-resolvable conflict here?
> > One more approach: hierarchy /usr/share/man-old. Everyone could choose
> > himself by (un)commenting out MANPATH in man.config.
> 
> If you really think these translations are worth the bandwith -- off by
> default and it's OK for me.
> 
> 
> About the implementation:
> 
>   $ rpm -qf /usr/share/man=20
>   FHS-2.3-7
> 
> Putting this hierarchy to FHS doesn't look like The Right Way for me,
> and we can't put it into man.spec (isn't required -> directories not
> owned by any package).  Ideas?

AFAIR, possibile using the pages by pinfo is the only reason it is not put
into man.spec...
Without browser pages are useless.

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology

_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to