On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 21:57 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > One more doubt: > I noticed that for some locales glibc encoding and Xlib encoding are > different (eg. for et_EE, tt_RU, most *_IN, uz_UZ etc.). > > Might it be a problem?
Not might. It is a problem. I've reported it at x.org quite some time ago, no reply from them. A workaround is to fully qualify your locale with the codeset name (e.g. en_US.UTF-8) -- it probably allows you to assume that X'es idea of your encoding is consistent with glibc (and via glibc with qt, gtk+, among others). I mean, how difficult is it to call nl_langinfo(CODESET), instead of reading an "alias" list? -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Never trust a man | | who can count up to 1023 on his fingers. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
