checking netatalk/at.h usability... no
checking netatalk/at.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: netatalk/at.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ##
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ##
checking for netatalk/at.h... yes
checking netrose/rose.h usability... no
checking netrose/rose.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: netrose/rose.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ##
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ##
checking for netrose/rose.h... yes
They don't know what sa_family_t is. After adding:
#include <ax25.h>
to both everything seems correct. Shouldn't it be there by default?
--
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>
http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
