havner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, havner wrote: > > > > Author: qboosh Date: Tue Oct 19 19:17:03 2004 GMT > > > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > > > > ---- Log message: > > > > - merged epoch 0 from RA-branch > > > > > > > > ---- Files affected: > > > > SPECS: > > > > clamav.spec (1.133 -> 1.134) > > > > > > > > ---- Diffs: > > > > > > > > ================================================================ > > > > Index: SPECS/clamav.spec > > > > diff -u SPECS/clamav.spec:1.133 SPECS/clamav.spec:1.134 > > > > --- SPECS/clamav.spec:1.133 Tue Oct 19 11:24:48 2004 > > > > +++ SPECS/clamav.spec Tue Oct 19 19:16:57 2004 > > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > > > Name: clamav > > > > Version: 0.80 > > > > Release: 4 > > > > +Epoch: 0 > > > AKAIK, epoch 0 is deafult one, so what is it for? > > > > RA-branch, babe :) It isn't there :) > > 1. It's HEAD, it's just taken from RA-branch > 2. even if it was on RA-branch so what? This list doesn't apply to RA? > 3. I don't care what branch is it ;-), i just technicaly asked why is it > needed?
It is needed as effect of previous changes: dependencies contains epoch. And because one-liner fix was simpler than few-liner fix. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
