On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:27:27 +0100 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > > ================================================================ > > Index: SPECS/hal.spec > > diff -u SPECS/hal.spec:1.32 SPECS/hal.spec:1.33 > > --- SPECS/hal.spec:1.32 Tue Nov 2 14:07:41 2004 > > +++ SPECS/hal.spec Tue Nov 2 14:21:03 2004 > > @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ > > # $Revision$, $Date$ > > # > > # TODO > > +# - for AC: solve problem with udev in /udev (it simply don't work) > > # - get rid of DESTDIR in pycompile (this breaks H-D-M) > > +# - test for messagebus service > > +# - implement hald --verbose=yes > > # > > i need some help with this. It works corectly only when udev is used > as static dev replacement, and i got no idea why. This stuff is evil, > things that are not fstab related (like digicams) working, but the > rest simplly won't. nobody cares? ;) i was wrong, it works. just forgot to replace s/\dev/\udev/ for fstab hardoced entries like cdrom, floppy. I'm about to uncomment hal patch in gnome-vfs2 (after little hal tuninng - look at hal.spec TODO list). but it needs more _testing_! Artur Flinta reported problems with pendrive automounting, but i do not own such hardware and i'm not able to figure what is wrong (i guess, i must to buy one ;). What you thing about it? any volunteers to test it? It can be a nice thing to put _fully working_ hal stuff in AC... BTW. it will be great to backport some udev changes from head to AC-branch like rules, premissions, etc. -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
