Nah, "r" instead of "L"; sorry. Jakub Bogusz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28-11-2004 15:14]: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:04:52PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: >> $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libsa.so.12.0.22 --requires [...] >> $ ldd /usr/lib/libsa.so.12.0.22 =20 >> libex.so.10 =3D> /usr/lib/libex.so.10 (0x41406000) >> libnsl.so.1 =3D> /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x41408000) [...] >> Shouldn't the libex.so.10 dependency be autogenerated? > They should. Is libsa.so.12.0.22 installed (in buildroot) with > execute permission?
No. Mystery solved, thanks. > PS. is libnsl needed here, or some Solaris-specific leftover? I don't know; guessing from other faults and your question I'd blame brain-dead ac/am. -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ GPG key: http://radek.karnet.pl/ ]
pgpnvaeNFo69n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
